From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:36:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20140317093602.GY27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20140317203124.3b947e0799cc8142df5e4a2e@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:55144 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753311AbaCQJgd (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 05:36:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140317203124.3b947e0799cc8142df5e4a2e@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josh Triplett On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 08:31:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in > kernel/locking/Makefile between commit fb0527bd5ea9 ("locking/mutexes: > Introduce cancelable MCS lock for adaptive spinning") from the tree and > commit 4dc0fe493027 ("lglock: map to spinlock when !CONFIG_SMP") from the > akpm-current tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). I'm a bit sad of not having seen that lglock patch at all.