From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh) Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 18:10:30 -0700 Message-ID: <20140508011030.GT19657@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20140507173341.753d8ccf4fe033abd513f98f@canb.auug.org.au> <536A9CF2.90906@infradead.org> <20140508080251.64eed8b579e307c25c46e27f@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:60438 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751800AbaEHBKc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2014 21:10:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jim Davis Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Randy Dunlap , linux-next , Rusty Russell , Michal Marek > >> > ps2mult.c:(.exit.text+0x8f): multiple definition of `cleanup_module' > >> > ps2mult.c:(.init.text+0xbc8): multiple definition of `init_module' > >> > ipack.c:(.exit.text+0x0): multiple definition of `cleanup_module' > >> > ipack.c:(.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module' > >> > mcb-core.c:(.text+0x40d): multiple definition of `cleanup_module' > >> > mcb-core.c:(.text+0x3fb): multiple definition of `init_module' > >> It sounds like it misdetects your binutils. LTO should disable itself when your binutils cannot handle it. Can you send me the full build log and output of ld --version and gcc --version please? -andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only