From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh) Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 10:08:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20140508170851.GU19657@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20140507173341.753d8ccf4fe033abd513f98f@canb.auug.org.au> <536A9CF2.90906@infradead.org> <20140508080251.64eed8b579e307c25c46e27f@canb.auug.org.au> <20140508011030.GT19657@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:61118 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751856AbaEHRKj (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2014 13:10:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jim Davis Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Randy Dunlap , linux-next , Rusty Russell , Michal Marek On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 10:05:35AM -0700, Jim Davis wrote: > On 5/7/14, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > It sounds like it misdetects your binutils. LTO should > > disable itself when your binutils cannot handle it. Can you send me > > the full build log and output of ld --version and gcc --version > > please? > > With next-20140518 I am getting > > buildlog-1399568101.txt:/home/jim/linux/scripts/Makefile.lto:76: > "WARNING: Too old linker version 22400000 for kernel LTO. You need > Linux binutils. CONFIG_LTO disabled." Ok so LTO is not active, and you still get errors. That is odd. > > I don't recall seeing that when the problems first started, but I > didn't save a buildlog from back then... Please send a full build log / config -Andi