From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 17:57:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20140514215707.GG15690@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20140514174749.1ec4d37f@canb.auug.org.au> <20140514145520.f010e4593071cf5a756ddc5b@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qg0-f51.google.com ([209.85.192.51]:37268 "EHLO mail-qg0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752442AbaENV5L (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2014 17:57:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140514145520.f010e4593071cf5a756ddc5b@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko Hello, On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 02:55:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > @@ -6026,7 +6026,7 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = { > > { > > .name = "low_limit_in_bytes", > > .private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_MEM, RES_LOW_LIMIT), > > - .write_string = mem_cgroup_write, > > + .write = mem_cgroup_write, > > .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_read_u64, > > }, > > Renaming buffer to buf was rather unneeded. > > I have 24 patches here against mm/memcontrol.c. Go gently, please. Yeah, sorry about that. That conflict wasn't necessary. Thanks. -- tejun