From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 08:01:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140521060100.GA5484@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537C2A72.9030503@zytor.com>
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> On 05/20/2014 09:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> > arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c between commit fa81511bb0bb ("x86-64,
> > modify_ldt: Make support for 16-bit segments a runtime option")
> > from Linus' tree and commit 34273f41d57e ("x86, espfix: Make it
> > possible to disable 16-bit support") from the tip tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> > action is required).
> >
>
> This (and the previous one) is not the correct fix, although it will
> work. The correct fix is instead to completely revert fa81511bb0bb
> before merging in tip:x86/espfix.
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience. Linus generally doesn't like it when we
> fix up merges for him, or I'd set up a "clean" tip:x86/espfix branch.
Please merge x86/urgent into x86/vdso while memories are still fresh -
fixing up conflicts between our own branches is entirely fine (I'm
doing it all the time to help the development flow) and it will make
life easier.
What Linus dislikes most are merges between completely _unrelated_
topic branches, especially if they cross maintenance domains.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-21 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-21 4:12 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-21 4:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-21 6:01 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-05-21 6:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-21 6:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-05-21 6:10 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-08 1:30 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-16 1:38 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-09 2:15 Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-15 1:08 Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-15 11:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-07-13 5:08 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-09 3:59 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-04 2:45 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-11 2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-11 20:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-06 2:39 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-06 2:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-08-12 1:21 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-11 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-11 0:52 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-11 10:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-11 11:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-10 1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-10 1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-18 5:10 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-18 7:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-06 2:17 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-06 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-12-20 1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-16 2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-03 2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-03 6:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-12-03 8:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-02 7:31 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-02 18:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-07-29 2:00 Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-06 5:53 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-12 2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-12 2:18 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-12 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-10-12 18:56 ` Kees Cook
2018-06-07 1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-12 1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-12 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-06 0:54 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-06 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-06 0:44 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-06 0:40 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-06 12:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-02-06 13:55 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-06 14:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-02-06 14:11 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-06 17:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-02-06 17:21 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-08 7:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-08 18:56 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-08 19:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-02-09 18:25 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-09 20:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-22 3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-22 8:32 ` Mark Rutland
2017-05-22 21:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-23 8:37 ` Mark Rutland
2016-02-03 0:09 Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-03 0:32 ` Toshi Kani
2015-09-18 1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-17 5:57 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-06 0:08 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-06 7:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-06 21:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-21 4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-21 4:23 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-21 8:47 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2014-02-18 3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-18 8:06 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2014-02-18 14:15 ` Chen Gang
2014-01-30 1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-30 1:49 ` Andi Kleen
2014-01-30 1:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-30 2:05 ` Andi Kleen
2014-01-28 0:43 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-17 3:30 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-17 17:27 ` Sören Brinkmann
2013-12-16 3:18 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-04 4:24 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-09 4:36 Stephen Rothwell
2012-12-03 4:19 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-16 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-21 16:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-10-15 0:32 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-10 2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-10 2:45 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-26 4:36 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-22 5:01 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-04 3:52 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-22 5:44 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-03 5:16 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-03 5:08 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-03 8:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-03 8:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-14 3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-14 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-14 9:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-08 5:02 Stephen Rothwell
2011-03-16 5:08 Stephen Rothwell
2011-03-16 8:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-03-16 11:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-22 2:08 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-06 2:47 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-23 3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-26 3:39 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-18 7:08 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-18 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-18 8:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-09 4:06 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-24 4:07 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-24 8:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-24 9:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-19 6:07 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-19 10:37 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140521060100.GA5484@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).