From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 14:15:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20140528211522.GA18268@kroah.com> References: <20140528194629.0757af1b@canb.auug.org.au> <1401271041.28714.22.camel@x220> <1401272095.28714.30.camel@x220> <1401308488.6186.10.camel@x220> <20140528204232.GA8224@kroah.com> <1401310082.6186.16.camel@x220> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:43950 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751418AbaE1VLu (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 17:11:50 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1401310082.6186.16.camel@x220> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Paul Bolle Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:48:02PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:42 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > Either is fine with me, I can revert it, or apply a fix, which ever you > > want, just let me know. > > Well, a proper fix would make this whole episode worthwhile. But if I > can't come up with anything that actually builds in a day or two it'll > have to be a revert. If that exceeds your patience you're free to hand > me a shorter deadline. How about I revert it now, that way you can provide a proper fix whenever you get the chance. thanks, greg k-h