From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:36:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20140923083652.GP30085@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20140923172339.32ad4301@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com ([217.140.108.86]:35820 "EHLO foss-mx-na.foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754958AbaIWIhF (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2014 04:37:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140923172339.32ad4301@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrew Morton , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Laura Abbott On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:23:39AM +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in > arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c between commit 2189064795dc ("arm64: > Implement set_arch_dma_coherent_ops() to replace bus notifiers") from > the arm64 tree and commit 50a477611cc9 ("arm64: add atomic pool for > non-coherent and CMA allocations") from the akpm-current tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). It looks fine. Thanks. -- Catalin