From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with Linus' tree Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:16:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20150416201657.GG6186@cbox> References: <20150318144111.1e56c6d9@canb.auug.org.au> <20150318075537.GC23225@cbox> <552403BF.8090008@redhat.com> <20150416191044.GF6186@cbox> <55300FDA.1010606@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:32991 "EHLO mail-la0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751596AbbDPUQs (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:16:48 -0400 Received: by layy10 with SMTP id y10so65385085lay.0 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55300FDA.1010606@redhat.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Christoffer Dall , Stephen Rothwell , Marc Zyngier , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:39:06PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 16/04/2015 21:10, Christoffer Dall wrote: > >> > > > As it turns out, it was not the same logic as Stephen's resolution. > > Stephen's resolution is bussy, because vlr is passed by value to > > vgic_queue_irq_to_lr() and therefore the call to sync the elrsr does not > > have any effect. > > > > Unfortunately, it seems Paolo's more correct fix did not end up in > > Linus' tree, so I guess I should just send a patch? > > Uhm, sure it did :) > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c#n1121 > I'm an idiot; I looked at 4.0 instead of master, sorry for the noise. -Christoffer