From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: clean up the kbuild tree?
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:58:48 -0800
Message-ID: <20151115175848.GD10150@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
References: <20151115112705.0bf4f0ed@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:56845 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752234AbbKOR6t (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:58:49 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151115112705.0bf4f0ed@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:27:05AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> I notice that the kbuild tree (relative to Linus' tree) only contains
> lots of merges and these 2 commits from April 2014:

Really should get in that patch officially. I have a variety of users.
And it clearly has been tested long enough in linux-next :)
Michal, enough to just repost it?

-Andi