linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, olof@lixom.net,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 16:44:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151117164453.GF30101@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4694362.ZPL12j6kR2@wuerfel>

Hi Arnd,

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 09:57:30AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 16 November 2015 19:05:05 Olof's autobuilder wrote:
> > 
> > Errors:
> > 
> >         arm64.allmodconfig:
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:71:3: error: read-only variable '___p1' used as 'asm' output
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:75:3: error: read-only variable '___p1' used as 'asm' output
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:79:3: error: read-only variable '___p1' used as 'asm' output
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:83:3: error: read-only variable '___p1' used as 'asm' output
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:71:3: error: read-only variable '___p1' used as 'asm' output
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:75:3: error: read-only variable '___p1' used as 'asm' output
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:79:3: error: read-only variable '___p1' used as 'asm' output
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:83:3: error: read-only variable '___p1' used as 'asm' output
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:71:3: error: read-only variable '___p1' used as 'asm' output
> 
> The patch below seems to fix it. Please review/apply.
> 
> 8<----
> Subject: ARM64: make smp_load_acquire() work with const arguments
> 
> smp_load_acquire() uses typeof() to declare a local variable for temporarily
> storing the output of the memory access. This fails when the argument is
> constant, because the assembler complains about using a constant register
> as output:
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:71:3: error: read-only variable '___p1'
>  used as 'asm' output

Do you know the usage in the kernel causing this warning?

> This changes the implementation to use an 'unsigned long' for the temporary value
> and only cast it to the original type in the end.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 624f9679f4b0..05fa329467f6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ do {									\
>  
>  #define smp_load_acquire(p)						\
>  ({									\
> -	typeof(*p) ___p1;						\
> +	unsigned long ___p1;						\
>  	compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p);				\
>  	switch (sizeof(*p)) {						\
>  	case 1:								\
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ do {									\
>  			: "=r" (___p1) : "Q" (*p) : "memory");		\
>  		break;							\
>  	}								\
> -	___p1;								\
> +	(typeof(*p))___p1;								\

My worry about having the cast here is if somebody decides to
smp_load_acquire from a packed 64-bit structure (e.g. some sort of lock),
then we'll get a conversion to non-scalar type error from the compiler.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-17 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <564a9961.878b420a.331b8.fffffd62@mx.google.com>
2015-11-17  8:57 ` next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-17 16:44   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-11-17 17:01     ` Eric Dumazet
2015-11-17 17:03     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-17 17:12       ` Will Deacon
2015-11-17 19:17         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-18 10:14           ` Will Deacon
2015-11-18 12:11             ` David Laight
2015-11-18 12:28               ` Will Deacon
2015-11-18 15:21                 ` David Laight
2015-11-18 15:36                   ` Will Deacon
2015-11-18 15:57                     ` David Laight
2015-11-18 10:22           ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151117164453.GF30101@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).