From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 07:16:55 +1100
Message-ID: <20151120071655.3e5c113d@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20151119120615.13b6ce0b@canb.auug.org.au>
	<CAHC9VhS3VGaAn34dM6pJ5KGM=jZ9bdyA71xMjD_t--YsPXF8pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20151119183012.GA1080@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151119183012.GA1080@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

Hi Richard,

On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:30:12 -0500 Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Stephen, your patch looks fine to me.  I had some minor concerns about
> deeper issues as to whether the original intent of that part of the
> audit subsystem was affected by this change, but that is WRT the
> conflicting patch rather than your merge.  After poking around a bit, I
> don't have any outstanding concerns.

Thanks for checking.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au