From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: linux-next: clean up the kbuild tree? Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:12:31 -0800 Message-ID: <20151124021231.GE8438@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20151115112705.0bf4f0ed@canb.auug.org.au> <20151115175848.GD10150@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <5649D3B9.7020701@suse.cz> <20151121010033.GB8438@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:48240 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751568AbbKXCMd (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:12:33 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Michal Marek , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > 5.x is better than 4.x but it's still a slower. It's also not incremential. > > At the last time I tested with the latest 5.x and stock binutils on > openSUSE Tumbleweed, I failed to build, unfortunately. Partly the > detection of gcc version doesn't work for 5.x, and partly something is Really? It work for me with gcc 5 > missing in binutils side, although it's already built with plugin. Yes it needs HJ Lu's Linux binutils, not the standard FSF binutils. The patch to fix LTO with ld -r was submitted to standard binutils, but they didn't want to fix the issue. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only