From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the tree Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 14:41:47 +0000 Message-ID: <20151203144147.b0f3aef5c02437f44cae6a5d@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA256"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__3_Dec_2015_14_41_47_+0000_XNm5MUT=haBahf+I" Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Airlie , Jani Nikula , Patrik Jakobsson , Imre Deak , Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Thu__3_Dec_2015_14_41_47_+0000_XNm5MUT=haBahf+I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dave, Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in=20 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c between commit ac9b8236551d11 ("drm/i915: Introduce a gmbus power domain") from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit 73dfc227ff5c8e005 ("drm/i915/skl: init/unin= it display core as part of the HW power domain state") from the drm tree. It also seems like the gmbus power domain commit has been added in both trees. I fixed it up (resulting in an empty diff) and can carry the fix as necessa= ry (no action is required). --Signature=_Thu__3_Dec_2015_14_41_47_+0000_XNm5MUT=haBahf+I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWYFSrAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQJrQH/2yX7cwK0z3mqhJR7FmAGMOJ S88wiRXRJOtSZBa8rpkwAOuZVjFOICN0yrSCT5mA7ad4WKDjA3ZTu7s7WWRhFmiS mKpxFzXPSUGQWikBqXyOqx+MELyBiN3PrVCgtap5xlmRAxaA/r47B/SAhVN5lNnj O9/y0SsKoAJXXMlYJOn1KahHAhsRPPXJzOQhPeEVAspfBufzHB1i4TWwCafaoNfc LYK3KNKtat6d0xrhr8dJHhXv6eFSm0UsBtkhERQVSSZk/Xux3w5/HNPJnzX+K/Yt T+WAs6dDpDWS84MZpwiCvx1kVaG6h7cHt1J4ijGzqXUGls9OuYKNH1gEltwYxOE= =YCDi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__3_Dec_2015_14_41_47_+0000_XNm5MUT=haBahf+I--