From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:55:46 +0000 Message-ID: <20160125135546.GS6588@sirena.org.uk> References: <20160115151401.03fe1a39ca397079407c2ca9@linux-foundation.org> <20160121073859.3a6c22a3@canb.auug.org.au> <20160122112442.75c07aac@canb.auug.org.au> <20160122134045.438cd9d9@canb.auug.org.au> <20160125114150.GK6588@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="c5q8qXpFyTLF5PN4" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Sudip Mukherjee , Vinod Koul , Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pierre-Louis Bossart List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --c5q8qXpFyTLF5PN4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:45:55PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Argh, a typo here. I forgot to refresh the patch, sorry. > Below is the revised one. This makes sense to me. Reviwed-by: Mark Brown though we will need to come up with an alternative solution for the affected architectures if anyone ends up caring (MIPS or PowerPC might possibly). --c5q8qXpFyTLF5PN4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWpilhAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ52YH/RhJkqv5U0c57PLoWTOUQLcr I5kdfpsbTaPKr9GtL2lMP8f6sjBUiurrT3e/gsEIj5Pd0KS7VOkZhqF0oxQaytE6 rooo8NGcJV1rCtV4V72zf3JUu+mcS49ixe1Vn642TUtMqUIUIcLA53Qe1iRo3j/s UOXJvTEoRcWfZLwG7LvXAL0yEQm6nn2cro4V3u+RQ7PA3jxYSFdJaqn1SLRNNxfp VnqPJXc435H95IRZ5SqxQOlCAUQ4aVz+w/7iC0RdcX0jgsucmW/Q1UjzKCisv7W3 KTP5ovu16e0EXmNWh9tpbPDsNWeN0nDwZ7HRdVVk2DAygUVSP/LvXsb+AYL7CQM= =1VUL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c5q8qXpFyTLF5PN4--