linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
	Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:16:24 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160229151624.338cef0e@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

Hi Joerg,

Today's linux-next merge of the iommu tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi

between commit:

  93e9f5ee1e35 ("dts: arm64: Add EFUSE device node")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

  5ff6b3a6d391 ("dts: mt8173: Add iommu/smi nodes for mt8173")

from the iommu tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
index f4bd3c9182ad,804881181fcc..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
@@@ -277,11 -278,17 +278,22 @@@
  			reg = <0 0x10200620 0 0x20>;
  		};
  
+ 		iommu: iommu@10205000 {
+ 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-m4u";
+ 			reg = <0 0x10205000 0 0x1000>;
+ 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 139 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
+ 			clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_M4U>;
+ 			clock-names = "bclk";
+ 			mediatek,larbs = <&larb0 &larb1 &larb2
+ 					  &larb3 &larb4 &larb5>;
+ 			#iommu-cells = <1>;
+ 		};
+ 
 +		efuse: efuse@10206000 {
 +			compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-efuse";
 +			reg = <0 0x10206000 0 0x1000>;
 +		};
 +
  		apmixedsys: clock-controller@10209000 {
  			compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-apmixedsys";
  			reg = <0 0x10209000 0 0x1000>;

             reply	other threads:[~2016-02-29  4:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-29  4:16 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2022-05-06  2:39 linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160229151624.338cef0e@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).