linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree
@ 2016-06-06  0:06 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2016-06-06  0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Linus Walleij

Hi Krzysztof,

Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig

between commit:

  5c34a4e89c74 ("ARM: do away with ARCH_[WANT_OPTIONAL|REQUIRE]_GPIOLIB")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

  9479f7cc9187 ("soc: samsung: pm_domains: Enable COMPILE_TEST for build coverage")

from the samsung-krzk tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
index ecf139f31c4c,3fa6e7b8c3fe..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
@@@ -18,7 -19,7 +18,8 @@@ menuconfig ARCH_EXYNO
  	select EXYNOS_THERMAL
  	select EXYNOS_PMU
  	select EXYNOS_SROM
+ 	select EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS if PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
 +	select GPIOLIB
  	select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
  	select HAVE_S3C2410_I2C if I2C
  	select HAVE_S3C2410_WATCHDOG if WATCHDOG

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree
@ 2022-01-31 22:53 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2022-01-31 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM
  Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linux Next Mailing List, Sam Protsenko

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 869 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got conflicts in:

  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850-pinctrl.dtsi
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi

between commit:

  e3493220fd3e ("arm64: dts: exynos: Add initial Exynos850 SoC support")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

  bfb3c7fa3950 ("arm64: dts: exynos: Add initial Exynos850 SoC support")

from the samsung-krzk tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the latter, more recent, version) and can
carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.



-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree
@ 2019-06-25  0:03 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-06-25  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Stefan Agner

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1340 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile

between commit:

  3fe1ee40b2a2 ("ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

  24d2c73ff28b ("ARM: exynos: Only build MCPM support if used")

from the samsung-krzk tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
index 5ccf9d7e58d4,5abf3db23912..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
@@@ -14,5 -14,9 +14,5 @@@ obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)		+= suspend.
  
  obj-$(CONFIG_SMP)		+= platsmp.o headsmp.o
  
- obj-$(CONFIG_MCPM)		+= mcpm-exynos.o
 -plus_sec := $(call as-instr,.arch_extension sec,+sec)
 -AFLAGS_exynos-smc.o		:=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
 -AFLAGS_sleep.o			:=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
 -
+ obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_MCPM)	+= mcpm-exynos.o
  CFLAGS_mcpm-exynos.o		+= -march=armv7-a

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree
  2019-06-24 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2019-06-24 23:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-06-24 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1536 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:59:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm/configs/s3c6400_defconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   6c48edcc955a ("ARM: configs: Remove useless UEVENT_HELPER_PATH")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
> 
>   5a96019ce5cd ("ARM: defconfig: samsung: Cleanup with savedefconfig")
> 
> from the samsung-krzk tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm/configs/s3c6400_defconfig
index 6eea99300f7f,34f9992ce8e9..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/configs/s3c6400_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/s3c6400_defconfig
@@@ -18,9 -15,12 +15,11 @@@ CONFIG_MACH_HMT=
  CONFIG_MACH_SMARTQ5=y
  CONFIG_MACH_SMARTQ7=y
  CONFIG_MACH_WLF_CRAGG_6410=y
- CONFIG_AEABI=y
  CONFIG_CMDLINE="console=ttySAC0,115200 root=/dev/ram init=/linuxrc initrd=0x51000000,6M ramdisk_size=6144"
  CONFIG_VFP=y
 -CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH="/sbin/hotplug"
+ CONFIG_MODULES=y
+ CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y
+ # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG is not set
  CONFIG_MTD=y
  CONFIG_MTD_RAW_NAND=y
  CONFIG_MTD_NAND_S3C2410=y

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree
@ 2019-06-24 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
  2019-06-24 23:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-06-24 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 767 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/configs/s3c6400_defconfig

between commit:

  6c48edcc955a ("ARM: configs: Remove useless UEVENT_HELPER_PATH")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

  5a96019ce5cd ("ARM: defconfig: samsung: Cleanup with savedefconfig")

from the samsung-krzk tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.



-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree
       [not found] ` <CGME20160916085054eucas1p261bf6f0fb00e860fb819139557ffe5bb@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
@ 2016-09-16  8:50   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2016-09-16  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Marc Zyngier

On 09/05/2016 03:19 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   585dcacac6bb ("arm64: dts: Fix broken architected timer interrupt trigger")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
> 
>   36d1c9cd07cd ("arm64: dts: exynos: Use human-friendly symbols for timer interrupt flags")
> 
> from the samsung-krzk tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I *think* - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

The fix is correct, for the record:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Merge conflict was (unfortunately) expected. In general, the
multiple-platform-at-once patches are conflict prone. Especially in this
case, Marc's patch ("arm64: dts: Fix broken architected...") could be
split per architecture.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree
@ 2016-09-05  1:19 Stephen Rothwell
       [not found] ` <CGME20160916085054eucas1p261bf6f0fb00e860fb819139557ffe5bb@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2016-09-05  1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Marc Zyngier

Hi Krzysztof,

Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi

between commit:

  585dcacac6bb ("arm64: dts: Fix broken architected timer interrupt trigger")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

  36d1c9cd07cd ("arm64: dts: exynos: Use human-friendly symbols for timer interrupt flags")

from the samsung-krzk tree.

I fixed it up (I *think* - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
index 162831546e18,8d7ce97c0ddb..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
@@@ -473,10 -474,14 +474,14 @@@
  
  		timer {
  			compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
- 			interrupts = <1 13 0xff08>,
- 				     <1 14 0xff08>,
- 				     <1 11 0xff08>,
- 				     <1 10 0xff08>;
+ 			interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13
 -					(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
++					(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
+ 				     <GIC_PPI 14
 -					(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
++					(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
+ 				     <GIC_PPI 11
 -					(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
++					(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
+ 				     <GIC_PPI 10
 -					(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>;
++					(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
  		};
  
  		pmu_system_controller: system-controller@105c0000 {

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree
  2016-03-01 22:14 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2016-03-01 23:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2016-03-01 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Alim Akhtar, Srinivas Kandagatla

On 02.03.2016 07:14, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   efdda175c07f ("arm64: defconfig: add spmi and usb related configs")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
> 
>   617fe7196d54 ("arm64: defconfig: Enable exynos thermal config")
>   6bb837189388 ("arm64: defconfig: Enable Samsung MFD and related configs")
> 
> from the samsung-krzk tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action

Yeah, that was expected... Thanks for the fix, looks fine from Samsung's
side.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree
@ 2016-03-01 22:14 Stephen Rothwell
  2016-03-01 23:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2016-03-01 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Alim Akhtar, Srinivas Kandagatla

Hi Krzysztof,

Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig

between commit:

  efdda175c07f ("arm64: defconfig: add spmi and usb related configs")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

  617fe7196d54 ("arm64: defconfig: Enable exynos thermal config")
  6bb837189388 ("arm64: defconfig: Enable Samsung MFD and related configs")

from the samsung-krzk tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 459e96aec818,df8f580b60e0..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@@ -30,11 -31,9 +30,11 @@@ CONFIG_MODULES=
  CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y
  # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG is not set
  # CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE is not set
 +CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI=y
 +CONFIG_ARCH_ALPINE=y
  CONFIG_ARCH_BCM_IPROC=y
  CONFIG_ARCH_BERLIN=y
- CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7=y
+ CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS=y
  CONFIG_ARCH_LAYERSCAPE=y
  CONFIG_ARCH_HISI=y
  CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK=y
@@@ -164,11 -147,14 +164,16 @@@ CONFIG_GPIO_XGENE=
  CONFIG_POWER_RESET_XGENE=y
  CONFIG_POWER_RESET_SYSCON=y
  # CONFIG_HWMON is not set
+ CONFIG_THERMAL=y
+ CONFIG_THERMAL_EMULATION=y
+ CONFIG_EXYNOS_THERMAL=y
+ CONFIG_MFD_SEC_CORE=y
 +CONFIG_MFD_SPMI_PMIC=y
  CONFIG_REGULATOR=y
  CONFIG_REGULATOR_FIXED_VOLTAGE=y
  CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_SMD_RPM=y
 +CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_SPMI=y
+ CONFIG_REGULATOR_S2MPS11=y
  CONFIG_FB=y
  CONFIG_FB_ARMCLCD=y
  CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y
@@@ -215,16 -191,13 +220,17 @@@ CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS=
  CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT=y
  CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_CPU=y
  CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y
+ CONFIG_RTC_DRV_S5M=y
  CONFIG_RTC_DRV_EFI=y
 +CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PL031=y
 +CONFIG_RTC_DRV_SUN6I=y
  CONFIG_RTC_DRV_XGENE=y
  CONFIG_DMADEVICES=y
 -CONFIG_RCAR_DMAC=y
  CONFIG_QCOM_BAM_DMA=y
  CONFIG_TEGRA20_APB_DMA=y
 +CONFIG_RCAR_DMAC=y
 +CONFIG_VFIO=y
 +CONFIG_VFIO_PCI=y
  CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=y
  CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=y
  CONFIG_VIRTIO_MMIO=y

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-31 22:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-06  0:06 linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-31 22:53 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-25  0:03 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-24 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-24 23:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-05  1:19 Stephen Rothwell
     [not found] ` <CGME20160916085054eucas1p261bf6f0fb00e860fb819139557ffe5bb@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2016-09-16  8:50   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-03-01 22:14 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-01 23:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).