From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:55:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20170410065552.44hidp2gpakyeawg@dell> References: <20170404164453.677dc74a@canb.auug.org.au> <20170404081937.npgk3cwx7bv5igzg@dell> <20170404082156.yhepja5bveahlegr@dell> <1491309075.708.125.camel@linux.intel.com> <20170410121107.69b83963@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f171.google.com ([209.85.128.171]:36768 "EHLO mail-wr0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751442AbdDJGzz (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2017 02:55:55 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c55so68350403wrc.3 for ; Sun, 09 Apr 2017 23:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170410121107.69b83963@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:31:15 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 09:21 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > > > After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > > > > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > > > > > > > > > /home/sfr/next/next/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c:25:31: > > > > > fatal error: asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h: No such file or directory > > > > > > > > > > Caused by commit > > > > > > > > > >   eb2a445f7d8f ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Fix a mess with compilation > > > > > units") > > > > > > > > > > I have reverted that commit for today. > > > > > > > > Andy, > > > > > > > > I'm pulling this commit.  Despite you thinking the error is unrelated > > > > to your patch, something is clearly wrong and I don't have time to > > > > investigate. > > > > > > > > Ball is in your court. > > > > > > Okay, I've had a *very* quick looks. > > > > > Seems as if you should be depending on INTEL_PMC_IPC. > > > > As a quick fix, yes. As a proper fix the PMC/SCU mess should be fixed in > > a way to provide a header in include/platform_data/x86. > > > > I will prepare v4. > > Thanks. > > Ping? I guess this is still causing an issue in -next? The patch has now been removed from mfd-next and the result pushed. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog