From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8188eu: style fixes Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:29:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20170428102932.GB20250@kroah.com> References: <20170420214226.GB1347@lear> <20170421042156.GA11495@kroah.com> <20170421080623.GA2553@lear> <20170421081849.GA20003@kroah.com> <20170423190305.GB7641@lear> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37828 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992611AbdD1Kaz (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 06:30:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170423190305.GB7641@lear> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Galo Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Larry Finger On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:03:06PM +0200, Galo wrote: > Fix multiple CHECK and WARNING issues in rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c, > mainly long lines, spaces around operators, unnecessary curly brackets. > > Signed-off-by: Galo Navarro > > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c | 186 +++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch did many different things all at once, making it difficult to review. All Linux kernel patches need to only do one thing at a time. If you need to do multiple things (such as clean up all coding style issues in a file/driver), do it in a sequence of patches, each one doing only one thing. This will make it easier to review the patches to ensure that they are correct, and to help alleviate any merge issues that larger patches can cause. - You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg, and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should look like. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot