From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:24:43 +1000 Message-ID: <20170628142443.0f78ee27@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20170628134310.3a605636@canb.auug.org.au> <595329D3.7080808@rock-chips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:40509 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751581AbdF1EYp (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:24:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <595329D3.7080808@rock-chips.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: jeffy Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Gustavo Padovan , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Hi jeffy, On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:00:19 +0800 jeffy wrote: > > commit 50816c48997af857d4bab3dca1aba90339705e96 > Author: Ingo Molnar > Date: Sun Mar 5 10:33:16 2017 +0100 > > sched/wait: Standardize internal naming of wait-queue entries > > > changed wait_queue_entry_t to struct wait_queue_entry, and also wait to > wq_entry, maybe we should do it too? Sure, but that can be done later. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell