From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 09:24:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20170826072404.ocjypnhp2b5rnh4l@gmail.com> References: <20170825143930.494744fe@canb.auug.org.au> <2984689e-ab4e-0c22-7151-adfeeffce4ed@redhat.com> <2b021bf3-9ace-8678-0793-c0048500469c@redhat.com> <575d1d5a-5cfb-49b4-0ce7-b78372739cb6@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:35723 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750818AbdHZHYI (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Aug 2017 03:24:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <575d1d5a-5cfb-49b4-0ce7-b78372739cb6@redhat.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Brijesh Singh , Tom Lendacky , Stephen Rothwell , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , KVM , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Yu Zhang , paolo.bonzini@gmail.com * Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 25/08/2017 22:41, Brijesh Singh wrote: > >>>> > > > >> Neither my version nor yours is correct. :) The right one has [0][i] > >> and [1][i] (I inverted the indices by mistake). > >> > >> With that change, you can include my > >> > >> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini > >> > > > > Ingo, > > > > I assuming that this patch should be sent through the tip since SME support > > came from tip. I will be submitting the patch very soon. > > Yes, that is correct. I cannot apply it directly to the KVM tree. I've merged it to tip:x86/mm where the SME bits live and will propagate it to linux-next ASAP, once it's gone through my local testing. Thanks, Ingo