From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nvdimm tree
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 17:34:25 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170904173425.5cc0e08d@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
Hi Dan,
After merging the nvdimm tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/dax/super.c:64:20: error: redefinition of 'fs_dax_get_by_bdev'
struct dax_device *fs_dax_get_by_bdev(struct block_device *bdev)
^
In file included from drivers/dax/super.c:22:0:
include/linux/dax.h:76:34: note: previous definition of 'fs_dax_get_by_bdev' was here
static inline struct dax_device *fs_dax_get_by_bdev(struct block_device *bdev)
^
Caused by commit
78f354735081 ("dax: introduce a fs_dax_get_by_bdev() helper")
The protection in drivers/dax/super.c is CONFIG_BLOCK, while in
include/linux/dax.h it is IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_DAX) and the Makefile
uses CONFIG_DAX.
I have reverted that commit and the following 3 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
next reply other threads:[~2017-09-04 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-04 7:34 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2017-09-04 18:34 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the nvdimm tree Dan Williams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-16 9:10 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-16 18:05 ` Dan Williams
2021-08-30 7:09 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-30 7:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-30 7:15 ` Gao Xiang
2019-07-05 7:20 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-05 8:45 ` Pankaj Gupta
2019-07-05 11:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-05 11:14 ` Pankaj Gupta
2019-07-05 22:32 ` Dan Williams
2019-07-05 23:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-20 9:29 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-20 10:30 ` Pankaj Gupta
2018-04-09 3:16 Stephen Rothwell
2018-04-09 3:38 ` Oliver
2018-04-09 7:34 ` Oliver
2018-04-09 17:11 ` Dan Williams
2018-04-09 18:14 ` Dan Williams
2017-11-03 7:19 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-03 16:04 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-24 6:11 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-24 8:39 ` Al Viro
2017-04-24 23:29 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-25 22:22 ` Dan Williams
2016-07-22 6:13 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-23 1:04 ` Dan Williams
2016-07-23 3:54 ` Dan Williams
2016-07-21 6:13 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-21 21:33 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-27 9:50 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170904173425.5cc0e08d@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).