linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	Chaya Rachel Ivgi <chaya.rachel.ivgi@intel.com>,
	Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@intel.com>,
	Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the wireless-drivers tree
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 19:59:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012185944.bip4cdk7bd4d6mpc@sirena.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507834251.5497.7.camel@coelho.fi>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 744 bytes --]

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:50:51PM +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 19:35 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > With trees like this that don't coordinate with their fixes branch
> > there
> > are frequently multiple conflicts introduced so I generally report
> > things file by file without even looking at the new ones.

> Sorry for the trouble.  But how do you suggest that we "coordinate our
> fixes branch"? Merge fixes into the main tree?

That'd be easiest for me!  It's not of necessity a problem if the
conflicts are easy enough to resolve if you just let things get merged
in -next, it's just more an observation that that's a thing that happens
and that this is how I cope with it.  Stephen may do things a bit
differently.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-12 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-12 17:25 linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the wireless-drivers tree Mark Brown
2017-10-12 18:16 ` Luciano Coelho
2017-10-12 18:21   ` Mark Brown
2017-10-12 18:27     ` Luciano Coelho
2017-10-12 18:35       ` Mark Brown
2017-10-12 18:50         ` Luca Coelho
2017-10-12 18:59           ` Mark Brown [this message]
2017-10-12 19:02             ` Luca Coelho
2017-10-12 18:29 ` Luca Coelho
2017-10-12 19:12   ` Mark Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-24  0:16 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-24  7:00 ` Kalle Valo
2020-03-24  7:29   ` Luca Coelho
2020-03-24  8:07     ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-31  0:13 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-31  9:36 ` Kalle Valo
2019-04-30  4:08 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-30  5:30 ` Luciano Coelho
2019-04-15  2:08 Stephen Rothwell
     [not found] ` <20190415120853.39e0e46a-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-18 13:49   ` Kalle Valo
2019-04-15  2:01 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-18 13:49 ` Kalle Valo
2018-04-26  1:09 Stephen Rothwell
     [not found] ` <20180426110917.446204af-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2018-04-26  7:38   ` Luciano Coelho
2018-04-26 10:33     ` Kalle Valo
2018-04-26 11:51       ` Luciano Coelho
2017-12-08  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-08 12:30 ` Kalle Valo
2017-10-12 17:20 Mark Brown
2017-10-12 17:14 Mark Brown
2015-05-25  3:07 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-01  9:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-01-16  4:20 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171012185944.bip4cdk7bd4d6mpc@sirena.co.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=chaya.rachel.ivgi@intel.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca@coelho.fi \
    --cc=shahar.s.matityahu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).