From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm64 tree
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:47:18 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101164718.66c27003@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm64/Kconfig
between commit:
396a5d4a5c32 ("arm64: Unconditionally support {ARCH_}HAVE_NMI{_SAFE_CMPXCHG}")
from the arm64 tree and commit:
087133ac9076 ("locking/qrwlock, arm64: Move rwlock implementation over to qrwlocks")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 38f8d26208af,6205f521b648..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@@ -21,8 -21,25 +21,25 @@@ config ARM6
select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX
select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
- select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG if ACPI_APEI_SEA
+ select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
+ select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK_BH if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK_IRQ if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK_IRQSAVE if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_BH if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK_BH if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK_IRQ if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_LOCK_IRQSAVE if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_BH if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ if !PREEMPT
+ select ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE if !PREEMPT
select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF
+ select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
next reply other threads:[~2017-11-01 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-01 5:47 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2017-11-13 22:52 ` linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-13 16:45 broonie
2021-08-27 4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-22 6:11 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-18 4:27 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-18 8:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-10 1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-15 4:25 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-15 4:21 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-22 3:38 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04 5:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-16 3:25 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-03 1:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-31 3:02 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-31 9:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-31 11:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-12 2:54 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-12 2:00 Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-29 3:56 Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-29 9:04 ` Matt Fleming
2016-02-26 1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-26 1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-22 2:26 Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-22 12:06 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-22 15:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-31 22:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-15 3:05 Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-13 2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-13 9:50 ` Will Deacon
2014-05-23 6:44 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-23 9:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-23 6:28 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-23 8:41 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171101164718.66c27003@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).