From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the workqueues tree Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:59:11 -0700 Message-ID: <20171103135911.GS3252168@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> References: <20171102143440.67acc666@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171102143440.67acc666@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Tal Shorer , Frederic Weisbecker List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:34:40PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Tejun, > > After merging the workqueues tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/workqueue.c: In function 'workqueue_init_early': > kernel/workqueue.c:5561:56: error: 'cpu_isolated_map' undeclared (first use in this function) > cpumask_andnot(wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask, cpu_isolated_map); > ^ > > Caused by commit > > b5149873a0c2 ("workqueue: respect isolated cpus when queueing an unbound work") > > interacting with commit > > edb9382175c3 ("sched/isolation: Move isolcpus= handling to the housekeeping code") > > from the tip tree. > > I am not sure how to fix this, so I have reverted b5149873a0c2 for today. I'm reverting it from my tree. Tal, can you please spin up a new patch against the sched branch? Let's either route it through sched branch or try again after the rc1. Thanks. -- tejun