From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:39:05 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <20171110.133905.725214727380201198.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20171110103100.3cffee49@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:50234 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755926AbdKJEjJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2017 23:39:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171110103100.3cffee49@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:31:00 +1100 > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in: > > net/sched/cls_basic.c > net/sched/cls_u32.c > > between commits: > > 0b2a59894b76 ("cls_basic: use tcf_exts_get_net() before call_rcu()") > 35c55fc156d8 ("cls_u32: use tcf_exts_get_net() before call_rcu()") > > from Linus' tree and commit: > > 1d8134fea2eb ("net_sched: use idr to allocate basic filter handles") > > from the net-next tree. This should be resolved as I've just merged 'net' into 'net-next'.