linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, ave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org>,
	Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the drm tree
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 16:58:31 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171113165831.19ebc9fa@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171030203756.35brom4ulrbgqesv@sirena.co.uk>

Hi all,

On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:37:56 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   44cd3939c111b7 ("drm/tilcdc: Remove redundant OF_DETACHED flag setting")
> 
> from the drm tree and commit:
> 
>   f948d6d8b792bb ("of: overlay: avoid race condition between applying multiple overlays")
> 
> from the devicetree tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> index 482299a6f3b0,54025af534d4..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave_compat.c
> @@@ -163,12 -162,8 +162,6 @@@ static struct device_node * __init tilc
>   		return NULL;
>   	}
>   
> - 	ret = of_resolve_phandles(overlay);
> - 	if (ret) {
> - 		pr_err("%s: Failed to resolve phandles: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> - 		return NULL;
> - 	}
>  -	of_node_set_flag(overlay, OF_DETACHED);
> --
>   	return overlay;
>   }
>   

Just a reminder that this conflict still exists.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-13  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-30 20:37 linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the drm tree Mark Brown
2017-11-13  5:58 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2017-11-13 15:40   ` Jyri Sarha
2017-11-13 18:43     ` Frank Rowand
2017-11-13 19:51       ` Jyri Sarha
2017-11-20  7:41         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-05-04  3:52 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-22  5:52 Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-06  1:48 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171113165831.19ebc9fa@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=frank.rowand@sony.com \
    --cc=jsarha@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=stephen.boyd@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).