From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the tip tree Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:31:44 +1100 Message-ID: <20171113223144.7563d1ad@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20171102135351.24ee83f9@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:35725 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752254AbdKMLbr (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 06:31:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171102135351.24ee83f9@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Masami Hiramatsu Hi all, On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:53:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) > produced these warnings: > > net/dccp/probe.c: In function 'dccpprobe_init': > net/dccp/probe.c:166:2: warning: 'register_jprobe' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] > ret = register_jprobe(&dccp_send_probe); > ^ > In file included from net/dccp/probe.c:26:0: > include/linux/kprobes.h:471:32: note: declared here > static inline int __deprecated register_jprobe(struct jprobe *p) > ^ > net/dccp/probe.c:170:4: warning: 'register_jprobe' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] > ret = register_jprobe(&dccp_send_probe); > ^ > In file included from net/dccp/probe.c:26:0: > include/linux/kprobes.h:471:32: note: declared here > static inline int __deprecated register_jprobe(struct jprobe *p) > ^ > net/dccp/probe.c: In function 'dccpprobe_exit': > net/dccp/probe.c:190:2: warning: 'unregister_jprobe' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] > unregister_jprobe(&dccp_send_probe); > ^ > In file included from net/dccp/probe.c:26:0: > include/linux/kprobes.h:479:33: note: declared here > static inline void __deprecated unregister_jprobe(struct jprobe *p) > ^ > net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c: In function 'tcpprobe_init': > net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c:280:2: warning: 'register_jprobe' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] > ret = register_jprobe(&tcp_jprobe); > ^ > In file included from net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c:24:0: > include/linux/kprobes.h:471:32: note: declared here > static inline int __deprecated register_jprobe(struct jprobe *p) > ^ > net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c: In function 'tcpprobe_exit': > net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c:298:2: warning: 'unregister_jprobe' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] > unregister_jprobe(&tcp_jprobe); > ^ > In file included from net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c:24:0: > include/linux/kprobes.h:479:33: note: declared here > static inline void __deprecated unregister_jprobe(struct jprobe *p) > ^ > net/sctp/probe.c: In function 'sctp_setup_jprobe': > net/sctp/probe.c:189:2: warning: 'register_jprobe' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] > int ret = register_jprobe(&sctp_recv_probe); > ^ > In file included from net/sctp/probe.c:28:0: > include/linux/kprobes.h:471:32: note: declared here > static inline int __deprecated register_jprobe(struct jprobe *p) > ^ > net/sctp/probe.c:194:3: warning: 'register_jprobe' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] > ret = register_jprobe(&sctp_recv_probe); > ^ > In file included from net/sctp/probe.c:28:0: > include/linux/kprobes.h:471:32: note: declared here > static inline int __deprecated register_jprobe(struct jprobe *p) > ^ > net/sctp/probe.c: In function 'sctpprobe_exit': > net/sctp/probe.c:240:2: warning: 'unregister_jprobe' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] > unregister_jprobe(&sctp_recv_probe); > ^ > In file included from net/sctp/probe.c:28:0: > include/linux/kprobes.h:479:33: note: declared here > static inline void __deprecated unregister_jprobe(struct jprobe *p) > ^ > > Introduced by commit > > 590c84593045 ("kprobes: Disable the jprobes APIs") > > These days we normally don't deprecate things, just remove them. But we > do that *after* fixing up all the usages in the tree, please. Just a reminder that I am still getting these warnings. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell