From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the netfilter-next tree Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:46:17 +1100 Message-ID: <20171116094617.029257cb@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20171107110248.7f1924a7@canb.auug.org.au> <20171108190052.63dfd8ce@canb.auug.org.au> <20171108234014.GA1788@salvia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171108234014.GA1788@salvia> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: David Miller , Networking , NetFilter , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Florian Westphal List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Hi Pablo, On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 00:40:14 +0100 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:00:52PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:02:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > After merging the netfilter-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > > ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning: > > > > > > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:536:15: warning: 'ctnetlink_proto_size' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > > static size_t ctnetlink_proto_size(const struct nf_conn *ct) > > > ^ > > > > > > Introduced by commit > > > > > > 5caaed151a68 ("netfilter: conntrack: don't cache nlattr_tuple_size result in nla_size") > > > > I assume that this warning will now be in the net-next tree ... > > It's my fault, I'll fix this in my next batch, sorry for the inconvenience. This has now made it into Linus' tree :-( -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell