From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
"josh@joshtriplett.org" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com" <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi-mkp tree
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:43:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171211174351.GV7829@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1k1xyvxrx.fsf@oracle.com>
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:00:50PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> > I'm perfectly OK with taking it through the SCSI tree. Probably the
> > path of least resistance.
>
> Applied to 4.16/scsi-queue and rebased so it sits before Bart's patch.
Thank you! I have removed this patch from -rcu.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-07 3:57 linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi-mkp tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-07 3:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-07 4:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-07 4:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-07 17:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-07 17:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-07 20:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-07 21:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-07 21:11 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-12-08 1:00 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-12-11 17:43 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-22 5:32 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-23 22:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-23 22:59 ` Martin K. Petersen
2023-06-15 3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-15 4:19 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-16 16:51 ` Martin K. Petersen
2023-01-16 2:24 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-16 17:55 ` Mike Christie
2023-01-16 18:07 ` Martin K. Petersen
2022-08-24 1:50 Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-29 4:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-30 2:11 ` Martin K. Petersen
2022-04-27 3:38 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-27 7:40 ` Sumit Saxena
2022-04-27 8:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-17 9:47 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-17 9:51 ` John Garry
2021-08-18 3:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-18 11:41 ` John Garry
2021-05-27 3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-12 3:17 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-12 3:20 ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-25 4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-25 5:53 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-01-27 7:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-27 17:10 ` Douglas Gilbert
2020-12-08 9:28 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-08 9:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 10:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-08 9:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-08 17:55 ` Alan Stern
2020-12-08 19:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-21 6:30 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-23 5:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-23 15:01 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-07-24 4:21 ` Kiwoong Kim
2020-01-22 4:10 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-22 9:51 ` John Garry
2020-01-23 2:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-10-25 3:07 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-25 18:03 ` James Smart
2019-10-28 5:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-29 2:28 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-10-29 2:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-09 6:27 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-10 1:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-10 1:33 ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-04-10 4:04 ` James Bottomley
2019-04-10 4:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-22 6:25 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-22 16:33 ` Madhani, Himanshu
2017-05-17 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-23 3:12 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-23 14:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-02-23 15:04 ` Chad Dupuis
2017-02-22 2:41 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-22 21:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-22 21:10 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-02-22 21:13 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-22 21:17 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-02-27 1:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-27 15:25 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171211174351.GV7829@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).