From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 08:03:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20180208070350.mxirhg32zljp2e4k@gmail.com> References: <20180206114048.6c8ced1c@canb.auug.org.au> <750091485.16756.1517921554396.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20180206135512.GB22740@arm.com> <1815310787.16844.1517926010063.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20180206141118.GC22740@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:33036 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750749AbeBHHDz (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2018 02:03:55 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180206141118.GC22740@arm.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Will Deacon Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux-Next Mailing List , linux-kernel * Will Deacon wrote: > For the sake of avoiding the conflict, can we just drop it for now, please? Yeah, so I resolved the conflict by merging the (already upstream) bits and Linus pulled that resolution. From now on the level of comments you want there is up to you! :-) Thanks, Ingo