From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 18:25:31 +0000 Message-ID: <20180209182530.GB21542@arm.com> References: <20180206114048.6c8ced1c@canb.auug.org.au> <750091485.16756.1517921554396.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20180206135512.GB22740@arm.com> <1815310787.16844.1517926010063.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20180206141118.GC22740@arm.com> <20180208070350.mxirhg32zljp2e4k@gmail.com> <20180208185637.GB16314@arm.com> <989035723.18493.1518116696482.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51548 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751029AbeBISZ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2018 13:25:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <989035723.18493.1518116696482.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Ingo Molnar , Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux-Next Mailing List , linux-kernel On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 07:04:56PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:56 PM, Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 08:03:50AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > >> * Will Deacon wrote: > >> > >> > For the sake of avoiding the conflict, can we just drop it for now, please? > >> > >> Yeah, so I resolved the conflict by merging the (already upstream) bits and > >> Linus > >> pulled that resolution. From now on the level of comments you want there is up > >> to > >> you! :-) > > > > Haha, ok! Mathieu -- are you still planning to add something under > > Documentation/? Regardless of my preference on comments, I think it would > > be useful. > > I submitted it as RFC a few days ago, and I'm still awaiting feedback: > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1517936413-19675-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com > > If you guys are OK with the approach, I can submit it again, this time without the RFC > tag. Yes, please! Will