From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm-soc tree Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 09:48:07 +1000 Message-ID: <20180403094807.1466d120@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20180319140657.223852a1@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/MViTOkDLT6Otlh3illQAYas"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180319140657.223852a1@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , ARM Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Robin Murphy List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --Sig_/MViTOkDLT6Otlh3illQAYas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: >=20 > drivers/bus/arm-cci.c >=20 > between commit: >=20 > 3de6be7a3dd8 ("drivers/bus: Split Arm CCI driver") >=20 > from the arm-soc tree and commit: >=20 > edb39592a587 ("perf: Fix sibling iteration") >=20 > from the tip tree. >=20 > I fixed it up (I added the following merge fix patch) and can carry the > fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, > but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream > maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want > to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to > minimise any particularly complex conflicts. >=20 > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:04:52 +1100 > Subject: [PATCH] perf/core: another merge fix for "drivers/bus: Split Arm= CCI > driver" >=20 > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > --- > drivers/perf/arm-cci.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c > index 192d23b760a0..383b2d3dcbc6 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c > @@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ static int validate_group(struct perf_event *event) > if (!validate_event(event->pmu, &fake_pmu, leader)) > return -EINVAL; > =20 > - list_for_each_entry(sibling, &leader->sibling_list, sibling_list) { > + for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader) { > if (!validate_event(event->pmu, &fake_pmu, sibling)) > return -EINVAL; > } > --=20 This conflict is now between the arm-soc tree and Linus' tree. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/MViTOkDLT6Otlh3illQAYas Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAlrCwTcACgkQAVBC80lX 0GytmggAiFJjDKf/6NcerucjA1K4Jg6ILMYyj7H9zvXZZdMT0+QfuZQg1mq7ukih WdRKYHvuNNfqSZmWIiMzbBiaRb5elE7MOMOC0sau0E85w39V+uDo2lHD5OqHoa/7 zoIIWU1lDTuvuVRBTikBtOruErXFF+UX2GCnm4ixzPguLXMiGAAWmBdZioRX3CAy 3RlW9/VGLpDQDS/fer2l5Na5TtobwWlgovKVTrueDMwQIdC+IkXb+7DotsW/Y4Hn rkpHXhHhuz9UHoTAeNg5+md9kxEtvpvIU/hjmJ0Etyfzmwg41rGfP8kpjoKxNZ9j b3JSKF+KV2/zh0iyj3BCmt99QvS+qQ== =0cT1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/MViTOkDLT6Otlh3illQAYas--