Hi Dave, On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 10:59:04 +1000 Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:34:03AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in: > > > > fs/gfs2/bmap.c > > > > between commit: > > > > 628e366df11c ("gfs2: Iomap cleanups and improvements") > > > > from Linus' tree and commit: > > > > 7ee66c03e40a ("iomap: move IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY to gfs2") > > > > from the xfs tree. > > We should have seen this before the gfs2 tree was merged into Linus' > tree. Does that mean the gfs2 tree is not being pulled into the > linux-next tree? It is pulled in, but the above gfs2 commit was only committed to the linux-next included branch overnight and then Linus was asked to pull it before I got a chance to build today's linux-next. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell