From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 14:45:30 +1000 Message-ID: <20180608144530.782d7aee@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/7UF87IhDa62mIJnFa_Z=6bY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , OGAWA Hirofumi List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --Sig_/7UF87IhDa62mIJnFa_Z=6bY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andrew, After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning: In file included from fs/fat/inode.c:24:0: fs/fat/inode.c: In function '__fat_get_block': fs/fat/inode.c:163:9: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long = int', but argument 5 has type 'sector_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wfo= rmat=3D] "invalid FAT chain (i_pos %lld, last_block %ld)", ^ fs/fat/fat.h:397:24: note: in definition of macro 'fat_fs_error' __fat_fs_error(sb, 1, fmt , ## args) ^~~ Introduced by commit 3bdac70a1921 ("fat: use fat_fs_error() instead of BUG_ON() in __fat_get_b= lock()") --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/7UF87IhDa62mIJnFa_Z=6bY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAlsaCeoACgkQAVBC80lX 0GyKVwf9HyNfDYXAt0Rc8u0Lm3gAVLRK8J8HF3k1OD3prNhlAUOheDD35kbD88Jv GYhzbzrDeH7eAahSXaHt/5rCrSObX5dPz0F4SX1LrMwPwY3ll8DkfJrig8w0CujZ KFTkL/gm5R51Hak5fdTVaPR9Nz3o30unbxqIu/abwY88mVoJaU20me0QWMUDLVQj mkKrq3bJd6d0frubilUHNOnWXjZZSRHmugNiuOkr9GKXa5YabGegBXfLMLbtNRaJ k/LLIznRh9/Z7AeO6UbmYJMW0EwoeTbO/CGBiR19S6dUZXGajQ6yTjdEWy00O31x +qtFo/JheKXMA3sHQ0zcAb3CvsP+UQ== =YGvW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/7UF87IhDa62mIJnFa_Z=6bY--