From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 22:49:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20181209214907.GC21186@lunn.ch> References: <20181210080045.0e67ad79@canb.auug.org.au> <20181209211139.GB21186@lunn.ch> <011f5be3-4bc1-2e64-0ddf-b43b8dbc4dcd@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <011f5be3-4bc1-2e64-0ddf-b43b8dbc4dcd@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: David Miller , Stephen Rothwell , Networking , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Florian Fainelli List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 10:33:10PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > On 09.12.2018 22:11, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 08:00:45AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Commits > >> > >> dc9d38cec71c ("net: phy: mdio-gpio: Add phy_ignore_ta_mask to platform data") > >> 04fa26bab06d ("net: phy: mdio-gpio: Add platform_data support for phy_mask") > >> > >> are missing a Signed-off-by from their author. > > > > Hi David. > > > > Any idea what happened here? The version in my git repo has SOB. > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1009811/ also has my SOB. > > > Instead of > v2 > -- > int -> u32 in platform data structure > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn > > shouldn't it be > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn > --- > v2 > - int -> u32 in platform data structure Hi Heiner David said he wanted to see the version history. So i deliberately put it above the ---. I'm just wondering if -- was enough to trigger something in David's scripts? Or patchwork. The -- has disappeared in the commit which made it into net-next. Andrew