linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:12:52 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181219151252.3e27a7f8@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 743 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:

  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c

between commit:

  eb012ef3b4e3 ("x86: Remove Intel MPX")

from the tip tree and commit:

  b666a4b69739 ("kvm: x86: Dynamically allocate guest_fpu")

from the kvm tree.

I fixed it up (the former removed some code updated by the latter, so I
did that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2018-12-19  4:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-19  4:12 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2018-12-19 20:32 ` "x86: Remove Intel MPX" is wrong (Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree) Paolo Bonzini
2018-12-19 20:54   ` Dave Hansen
2018-12-19 21:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-12-19 21:28       ` Dave Hansen
2018-12-19 21:40         ` Paolo Bonzini
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-18  0:32 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-01  0:18 Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-01  0:14 Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-15 23:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-10  2:16 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-10  2:28 ` Like Xu
2021-12-13 17:46 broonie
2021-12-13 18:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 18:23 ` Mark Brown
2021-10-25  5:11 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-21  2:39 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-21 15:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-22  4:30 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-22  4:45 ` Nadav Amit
2021-04-22  4:58   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-22  6:29   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-29  6:47 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-17  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-02  4:53 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-04  3:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-16  2:48 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-17  5:22 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-19  3:25 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-08  3:54 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15  4:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06  5:12 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06  6:27 ` Tianyu Lan
2018-02-02  0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-15  2:39 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-28  4:52 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04  6:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-25  4:39 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-25  6:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-25 13:57   ` Tom Lendacky
2017-08-25 16:53     ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-25 20:05       ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-25 20:41         ` Brijesh Singh
2017-08-25 20:42           ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-26  7:24             ` Ingo Molnar
2016-11-28  3:56 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-17  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-17  7:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-17 21:31   ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-12  2:54 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-19  4:59 Michael Ellerman
2015-05-26  4:45 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-30  4:26 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-16  7:14 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-16  7:53 ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181219151252.3e27a7f8@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcorr@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).