From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:50:19 +1100 Message-ID: <20190108205019.63ee0e04@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20190108131141.730e9c4f@canb.auug.org.au> <78f2ee4a-9851-2b5c-18c6-ba3f3e6bd302@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/87.Na2.kJfnNg6cGqx_2SRQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <78f2ee4a-9851-2b5c-18c6-ba3f3e6bd302@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --Sig_/87.Na2.kJfnNg6cGqx_2SRQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Anshuman, On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:24:18 +0530 Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > Just curious why the NUMA_NO_NODE definition did not get resolved from th= e local > numa.h which had the same ones copied over from linux/numa.h but anyways = the fix > looks okay. I assume that is /usr/include/numa.h (i.e. the system include file which is whatever the distro installed) while comes out of the tools/include directory (i.e. the one we copied over from the kernel source). --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/87.Na2.kJfnNg6cGqx_2SRQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAlw0clsACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gyu+wf+Mi/Q5OCYzDZUasaeWYGUHXu/OXxjIu2y36/h5i02Ri640GLXplJJhqRL o2gjCMgcjaI8KMdP80XKF32axAYFmM0119rZu7C/Y4yf/J/1BsdcLGB00e6SQ36X aE6q9HhTjB9xVnNCvAYaoK8F9alvUc5+4vhdgQxeQfL39fw+4Fr/fcJvtj0O/+n2 oH1V7do26aq1x014NjLjEMXmtBKq0MIV1rEPaS2PsERIuN9doIFhJVkw/pTZIqen powB9B2hBnWQs6X8ww0brtCSurMvt+Fp+CDQHevTpcuNDGfX+VBPkP1sEwjA+rT5 1sndaFfn7uI5jJewhzgrD519x1RpVg== =sVHt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/87.Na2.kJfnNg6cGqx_2SRQ--