From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the scsi-fixes tree
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:34:55 +1100
Message-ID: <20190206153406.0febc79c@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20190206072033.3d04f96b@canb.auug.org.au>
        <87tvhhmuzj.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 boundary="Sig_/e/PXiCKE5J8gFMidHWpaXfc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <87tvhhmuzj.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

--Sig_/e/PXiCKE5J8gFMidHWpaXfc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Vaibhav,

On Wed, 06 Feb 2019 09:25:12 +0530 Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> wro=
te:
>
> Martin, should I resend the patch with this fixed ?

I wouldn't bother, it is a really picky report (I almost didn't send
it) :-)

Consider it just a reminder for next time.
--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_/e/PXiCKE5J8gFMidHWpaXfc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAlxaY+8ACgkQAVBC80lX
0Gzj/wf9FVAuHXEgemdJbMqOrkD+2a1npnQVq19XcrTEmvajFzA4ISNzWIJoNyk2
sq5/U5IwY851Ur5o9h7MGjTuz7iVyW4cnEhZmXr3mtPbX3sMgd7iy66bcuvZTIDF
c/bs0YdOlnPydCL35qjqDh5/HnO5eoc42lC0Od86dInIiQZEbNd6equ6W9a1S1k/
gYOhUsKkZD/xVND50Nv0FyPQjqh4xIDDW2cK9dtxWMp3Fd0vjLXq5KVwT4+ddxDO
wpHkr5XA2E0YC7MOXt2zu+txs4LLgfeiUnFopzQrhCTXB0O4fiwm1WR2vnUYHc05
3lnIKPnbdoVoUj0LAspfCpEjlY9wQQ==
=SNO0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/e/PXiCKE5J8gFMidHWpaXfc--