linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Shych <michaelsh@mellanox.com>,
	Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with the watchdog tree
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 21:42:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307054209.GD44339@wrath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190307052701.GC44339@wrath>

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 09:27:01PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 02:37:35PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the drivers-x86 tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   include/linux/platform_data/mlxreg.h
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   9f03161a1bd8 ("platform_data/mlxreg: additions for Mellanox watchdog driver.")
> > 
> > from the watchdog tree and commit:
> > 
> >   9b28aa1d0eae ("platform_data/mlxreg: Document fixes for core platform data")
> > 
> > from the drivers-x86 tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> 
> Thanks Stephen.
> 
> I suspect this will be a rare occurence. That said - Vadim - could you please
> ensure that all the mellanox driver changes Cc the platform driver x86 mailing
> list by adding it to MAINTAINERS?

And, turns out, not so rare. We've been down this road before. I'll just prepare
the patch for the MAINTAINERS.

-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-07  5:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-04  3:37 linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with the watchdog tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-07  5:27 ` Darren Hart
2019-03-07  5:42   ` Darren Hart [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-02  4:04 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-02 18:09 ` Darren Hart
2017-05-02 19:12   ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-02 20:21     ` Darren Hart
2017-05-02 20:57       ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-05-02 21:30         ` Darren Hart
2017-05-02 21:58           ` Guenter Roeck
2017-05-02 22:35             ` Darren Hart
2017-05-03 14:24               ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2017-05-03 14:43                 ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190307054209.GD44339@wrath \
    --to=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelsh@mellanox.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=vadimp@mellanox.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).