From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the keys tree with the integrity tree
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:33:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626143333.7ee527ca@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1395 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the keys tree got a conflict in:
security/integrity/digsig.c
between commit:
8c655784e2cf ("integrity: Fix __integrity_init_keyring() section mismatch")
from the integrity tree and commit:
79512db59dc8 ("keys: Replace uid/gid/perm permissions checking with an ACL")
from the keys tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc security/integrity/digsig.c
index 868ade3e8970,e432900c00b9..000000000000
--- a/security/integrity/digsig.c
+++ b/security/integrity/digsig.c
@@@ -69,9 -70,8 +70,9 @@@ int integrity_digsig_verify(const unsig
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
-static int __integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id, struct key_acl *acl,
- struct key_restriction *restriction)
+static int __init __integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id,
- key_perm_t perm,
++ struct key_acl *acl,
+ struct key_restriction *restriction)
{
const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
int err = 0;
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-26 4:33 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2019-07-09 0:11 ` linux-next: manual merge of the keys tree with the integrity tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09 0:31 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-07-09 0:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-07 4:15 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-12 7:08 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190626143333.7ee527ca@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).