From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF0EC74A41 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A5321019 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=Mellanox.com header.i=@Mellanox.com header.b="RjuMwksX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727622AbfGKC0e (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 22:26:34 -0400 Received: from mail-eopbgr40053.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.4.53]:47683 "EHLO EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727463AbfGKC0d (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 22:26:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Mellanox.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=7cHZ/Mps1zGGP9xyKCK8tVrmFAOOIRvyJHupP4h9TpA=; b=RjuMwksX9sQRs8XWAaMe8kemSsHFIUWUdruL8ZGwS1/Lunvv9N1TEUMrY/tfgcOhvXQep6B7vhPLCQ5r+xinq/0URMr2VBfDzbzW9yzWVfbMi5hFWQwgPZXWVrMLgaU+XhVs/iUDksrLW39QVkuNBxvEhZg8TTmAwdymN/G6NE4= Received: from VI1PR05MB4141.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.171.182.144) by VI1PR05MB4143.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.171.182.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2052.19; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 +0000 Received: from VI1PR05MB4141.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f5d8:df9:731:682e]) by VI1PR05MB4141.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f5d8:df9:731:682e%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2052.020; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 +0000 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Stephen Rothwell CC: Leon Romanovsky , Bernard Metzler , Doug Ledford , David Miller , Networking , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree Thread-Topic: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree Thread-Index: AQHVNgpSNqxsVllq5U23Am+RwOaE5KbB1zsAgAJNFwCAAIW/AIAAAj0A Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 +0000 Message-ID: <20190711015854.GC22409@mellanox.com> References: <20190709135636.4d36e19f@canb.auug.org.au> <20190709064346.GF7034@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <20190710175212.GM2887@mellanox.com> <20190711115054.7d7f468c@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20190711115054.7d7f468c@canb.auug.org.au> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: YTBPR01CA0026.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:b01:14::39) To VI1PR05MB4141.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:803:4d::16) authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jgg@mellanox.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [156.34.55.100] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0833b2fe-25a9-4878-caa2-08d705a72d5d x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020);SRVR:VI1PR05MB4143; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR05MB4143: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:626; x-forefront-prvs: 0095BCF226 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(136003)(396003)(346002)(189003)(199004)(316002)(6246003)(99286004)(6916009)(386003)(7736002)(52116002)(305945005)(33656002)(26005)(66066001)(6512007)(8936002)(102836004)(6116002)(186003)(53936002)(6506007)(76176011)(8676002)(3846002)(486006)(36756003)(476003)(2616005)(25786009)(4326008)(5660300002)(68736007)(4744005)(11346002)(66946007)(54906003)(478600001)(81156014)(81166006)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(71190400001)(71200400001)(2906002)(6436002)(229853002)(1076003)(446003)(86362001)(6486002)(14454004)(256004);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:VI1PR05MB4143;H:VI1PR05MB4141.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: mellanox.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: LsXKwomZ/109ut7p8RyH71RqfhZB8ZJ01V6oo8nQ4S7Emw1fiNyymzElHzJGMlphr5K7aIBxIdbHYaH3LMG1Gg/Ks1EoQR08X1vH8UhN113YXB/eV+J0ueE2Zw0WREZ+ZWD1LAGugCbWOkZrKxmp55fdEfJ132ApemNGjNah92Mvjax3v6bZTmc3J3yhI5JJWbE3P8Z8PYyB64zifYxSvdvMigv2XKhJj5Xjns2eweDrVjccpTYVK+zTODzYcGZQJxbVdPGgQLLuNPpY614M/eUNAsvQ+kDk0hPo8PVhtsrE3oQn3MCjDqKbUlTQvV4i91Q8B0wO1z1RB8jt7JVIwwKGoc9Dx+I9lyJfsQ+/CLCGP+IA8x0jZ1rdcV8EtWn56Zzvnf981bqb7JD1afwHtpsVr55WTpgYIJqwTL1BbLw= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3D8D34EB44B9AF4C89FE0F2F428FB111@eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: Mellanox.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0833b2fe-25a9-4878-caa2-08d705a72d5d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27.7122 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: a652971c-7d2e-4d9b-a6a4-d149256f461b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: jgg@mellanox.com X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR05MB4143 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:50:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > So today this failed to build after I merged the rdma tree (previously > it didn;t until after the net-next tree was merged (I assume a > dependency changed). It failed because in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu (and > in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl) is only defined in a commit in the net-next > tree :-( ? I'm confused..=20 rdma.git builds fine stand alone (I hope!) If you merge it with netdev then the above patch is needed afer the merge as netdev changed to ifa_rcu I just did this a few hours ago to make and test the patch I sent above.. Jason