From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2141FC74A41 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 03:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB07B2084B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 03:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="nWAOXp2c" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726683AbfGKDQG (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:16:06 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:52599 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725977AbfGKDQG (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:16:06 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45kh5v73Qrz9sDB; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:16:03 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1562814964; bh=vRUTtWdpBuMzNVFWQu6sVkEqeMrSM/smM8cYnj9YkJ4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nWAOXp2cFO1vnrkyOudRlKtTeo925tV/Xnh2ajWm8rV7tjLOqKjd58j1MOcbi0bgo sO6bnOtrsaVuwkiKzinoLZrPk7mDWgJ0BJN9mBoLsIysEzVeGTDZdTbox9KYR/Mp3M CteH6qFOL/HK52TcE12ndZO7d+ekqSWE/KLmzoIMyTX8mZDlCZtqDuutaoH0XMI9JS bEx43pPkouGSi2VVJ0bO25qWVn2lPPs8bm7zW9q2bTxt/X1dhbIbpE/Gqd/MMEjMZf UhFOR3A2MexAAn4GQdEGPx/hTcsPw45n7o/AiYFmcIas5pc651kUydDAGZTXovxQuQ hc5W+3oL/Z81w== Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:16:03 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Leon Romanovsky , Bernard Metzler , Doug Ledford , David Miller , Networking , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree Message-ID: <20190711131603.6b11b831@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20190711131344.452fc064@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20190709135636.4d36e19f@canb.auug.org.au> <20190709064346.GF7034@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <20190710175212.GM2887@mellanox.com> <20190711115054.7d7f468c@canb.auug.org.au> <20190711015854.GC22409@mellanox.com> <20190711131344.452fc064@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/v=_kHvKDD7EhV76GN9sVn0W"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/v=_kHvKDD7EhV76GN9sVn0W Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:13:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe wro= te: > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:50:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > =20 > > > So today this failed to build after I merged the rdma tree (previously > > > it didn;t until after the net-next tree was merged (I assume a > > > dependency changed). It failed because in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu (and > > > in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl) is only defined in a commit in the net-next > > > tree :-( =20 > >=20 > > ? I'm confused..=20 > >=20 > > rdma.git builds fine stand alone (I hope!) =20 >=20 > I have "Fixup to build SIW issue" from Leon (which switches to using > in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu) included in the rmda tree merge commit because > without that the rdma tree would not build for me. Are you saying that > I don't need that at all, now? Actually , I get it now, "Fixup to build SIW issue" is really just a fixup for the net-next and rdma trees merge ... OK, I will fix that up tomorrow. Sorry for my confusion. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/v=_kHvKDD7EhV76GN9sVn0W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl0mqfMACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gz6SggAnbzQymEWzUF1Y27nGfuhZ+ENQ2ey4pG4HodqT59xsGZe8uZ4OdsnfFM5 IOzTm1qLRUc+FfHyBg6KYqZuM0rVUba9btbs8KJZ0uczUrNU+Jclb4OsqRC/QRuQ SftH1NOB/m9sb+Th+nYTfxbdlGZBg5OU7EeMIWM4YO1CC2dBWmKQKliX+Ag1eoMp MO7NJemUgL661F9S3PlZigNFYGMardF6FIOECxOQgPXNOaDvwNcqOwcBj04UWhN1 qAJTL/CuFHDkYO68OzeqwRKmMBYG0sDjibOO5Q5rrJbMEFatrCR6MHW+poj8LGDM K0OSovkphRFhc4PH1EnNs63lpJIQiw== =lbSx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/v=_kHvKDD7EhV76GN9sVn0W--