From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9FBC74A42 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 03:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5695206B8 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 03:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="pvQMD/53" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726997AbfGKD2A (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:28:00 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:33101 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726353AbfGKD17 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:27:59 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45khMb6z4nz9s4Y; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:27:55 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1562815676; bh=AF1YyH/59p2PdlXj1kEV8rgQSQxkXM7X3NhUx89uKKY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pvQMD/53hY2AX4+FL71jwT8Uu6vSWUw/M8GGAHSPsV2idIaXU+F3+mo6cqkwdDmnq pz3kAQEqUqo7TKxv57QF6l5fJX7IPbLcdmPmBsRapK0+HqfHVTaw7M+GD5plYC5NEV IvjAuSDwPmdDb1VcKBqmB/FW8GDTkQrGXv3jzGzm9B+Qh6S3bwoAUL6fxbPRT+jEZT 38iP1dviDC/A5OWYovbvXwCNGxu3xEmkTMeTPa365Dsxb+rIf8Zs4IKAcZSjcuO+1v Fy8on1JRF4o0axnQZIyIj5XasAn++nWcshew+ogRMk30VHYi7OLwwb8GCFajwKQdMv wixzonvTEPm1Q== Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:27:55 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Leon Romanovsky , Bernard Metzler , Doug Ledford , David Miller , Networking , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree Message-ID: <20190711132755.0d4f45c9@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20190711131603.6b11b831@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20190709135636.4d36e19f@canb.auug.org.au> <20190709064346.GF7034@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <20190710175212.GM2887@mellanox.com> <20190711115054.7d7f468c@canb.auug.org.au> <20190711015854.GC22409@mellanox.com> <20190711131344.452fc064@canb.auug.org.au> <20190711131603.6b11b831@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/lgR/euJAAvPcdiADQ4kmX/m"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/lgR/euJAAvPcdiADQ4kmX/m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:16:03 +1000 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: >=20 > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:13:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe w= rote: =20 > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:50:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > =20 > > > > So today this failed to build after I merged the rdma tree (previou= sly > > > > it didn;t until after the net-next tree was merged (I assume a > > > > dependency changed). It failed because in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu (and > > > > in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl) is only defined in a commit in the net-ne= xt > > > > tree :-( =20 > > >=20 > > > ? I'm confused..=20 > > >=20 > > > rdma.git builds fine stand alone (I hope!) =20 > >=20 > > I have "Fixup to build SIW issue" from Leon (which switches to using > > in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu) included in the rmda tree merge commit because > > without that the rdma tree would not build for me. Are you saying that > > I don't need that at all, now? =20 >=20 > Actually , I get it now, "Fixup to build SIW issue" is really just a > fixup for the net-next and rdma trees merge ... OK, I will fix that up > tomorrow. Sorry for my confusion. Actually, I have rewound my tree and am starting from the merge of the rdma tree again, so hopefully it should all be good today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/lgR/euJAAvPcdiADQ4kmX/m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl0mrLsACgkQAVBC80lX 0GzMigf+IwlW8eRSZ9yFVzhO+0aH3niLMNP7eUgPB4yVpdDGlbu/l7g3BXSDTSHC pYNkeiuycHgr8F5K7xUDwuPtOR/8NL4PxGywtwP56cJxDj0WxIDj4aFbSbdjWK5m AlTFbV+C2Pwcr8sSwgx4aX0u+FWSYjjWHtKnqi9MaAvQouAJR2y2+Rb7rwSp9mlw 2V3SC+hZxjKMeJ8bAwyrgCH5tZxHfTldZ6wMzIWIAJFooP3zJaGp3xY4Trau6Znb y+tpS/Cqz/QPEUOzKVBCX/xuDE+BGojRcDFgw72RYMPFtOKCh9buXnw1SgbE7Z1W Py2d8jKfKMvG0AYPyk/T2kT3ZQeTDA== =gNA9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/lgR/euJAAvPcdiADQ4kmX/m--