From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C52C3A59F for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4321A2070B for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729599AbfHZLNt (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:13:49 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.189]:3100 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727123AbfHZLNt (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:13:49 -0400 Received: from DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 02C649544AA7AF56D607; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:13:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) by DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:13:46 +0800 Received: from architecture4 (10.140.130.215) by dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:13:46 +0800 Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:13:02 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: Stephen Rothwell , Greg KH CC: Linux Next Mailing List , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , Gao Xiang , Chao Yu Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the staging tree Message-ID: <20190826111302.GA106991@architecture4> References: <20190826063024.GA1217@kroah.com> <20190826083733.GA129185@architecture4> <20190826085408.GB129185@architecture4> <20190826094341.GC129185@architecture4> <20190826095328.GA120601@architecture4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190826095328.GA120601@architecture4> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Originating-IP: [10.140.130.215] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme717-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.113) To dggeme762-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.108) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 05:53:28PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: [] > The attempt above compiles successfully as well... And I have tried > the following commands (Just in case...) and the result turns out > without any difference... > > $ make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig > $ make ARCH=x86_64 -j16 > > and I'm so confused now... Hope to get your hints... I think I got the warning now... Sorry, I thought it is a compile error. I am looking into that, sorry about that... Thanks, Gao Xiang > > Thanks, > Gao Xiang > > > > > Out of curiosity, are there some merge conflicts raised? Or could you give > > me some hints (code and .config) to reproduce that? since I don't find any > > potential issue in include/trace/events/erofs.h and fs/erofs/*... I have no > > idea what happened and how to do next... Thank you very much! > > > > Thanks, > > Gao Xiang > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Gao Xiang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Introduced by commit > > > > > > > > > > > > 47e4937a4a7c ("erofs: move erofs out of staging") > > > > > > > > > > > > (or, at least, exposed by it). It needs, at least, a "struct dentry;" > > > > > > added to the file. > > > > > > > > > > Odd, why has this never been seen before when the same files were in > > > > > drivers/staging/ and why 0-day isn't reporting this? > > > > > > > > I Think it is weird since it is never failed in staging and kbuild-all 0-day ci > > > > (my tree and you tree).... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gao, can you send me a patch for this? > > > > > > > > Got it, I will look into that... > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gao Xiang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > >