From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408EEC5ACAE for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 16:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A9F20838 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 16:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="E7Oked1X" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728842AbfIKQEM (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:04:12 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:33018 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728825AbfIKQEM (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:04:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rPqLQQZmMWfIlYV8Oxuof345Z2bJ62xEOdAOhKOltWw=; b=E7Oked1XqrIgsf0xHW15O7jX1 E1oZ+iVps9y6o6tndbcXQuXbcsDH0vrr1oV/ElWTy5Hixxjd8Wg/6ffzy2GGll47M2txqq0PCs0sV KGDByU00KdWiWjBUAJKAYJ8hUyk2+QqT+VfAvctMK39J6EhKf2xfA32Hm1VUJGvE2HyA2muV/y5V7 pBecImwee7skziMkTmbe/+vo7JpY2XZLxiDyo+FcIjwEOurs63jGwcpMCtDAvf96hc+P3Oh8FHVps DsfNflfSpsIbYnMqcpECWTlxsD23xjTmNRySMMce8T4fmsEqiZss6jWO5IFQN1kTd1S9w1kdutCHw fJwgk8P9w==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:58994) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i856G-0007JX-Eg; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:04:08 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i856C-00044H-Vp; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:04:05 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:04:04 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mike Rapoport , Chester Lin Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm tree Message-ID: <20190911160404.GX13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20190911001459.6ccc76ee@canb.auug.org.au> <20190910142128.GR13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20190911142106.GA6429@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190911142106.GA6429@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:21:07PM +0100, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:21:28PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > This is correctly signed off, but Mike didn't send the patch correctly. > > It missed a From: line for the proper author, so the patch was committed > > as if Mike had authored it, which he didn't. > > Sorry about that, haven't used the patch system for couple of years now. > Would you like me to resubmit the patch? No, I recommitted with the correct author. The patch system takes standard formatted patches (in the format you'd send to the mailing lists, complete with the From: header in the first line of the description, as if you're passing a patch along from someone else) with the exception of the KernelVersion: header which needs to appear somewhere before the patch (which can be either body or header.) > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:14:59AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Commit > > > > > > 2505b9ba9c37 ("ARM: 8904/1: skip nomap memblocks while finding the lowmem/highmem boundary") > > > > > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > Stephen Rothwell > > > > > > > > -- > > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up > > According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Mike. > > -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up