linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ryan Attard <ryanattard@ryanattard.info>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with the rcu tree
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:08:26 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191029150826.38c26ef8@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2057 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the scsi tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c

between commit:

  81db81f82993 ("drivers/scsi: Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_replace()")

from the rcu tree and commit:

  d188b0675b21 ("scsi: core: Add sysfs attributes for VPD pages 0h and 89h")

from the scsi tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
index cc51f4756077,0fa2ed343c7f..000000000000
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
@@@ -466,12 -467,18 +467,18 @@@ static void scsi_device_dev_release_use
  	sdev->request_queue = NULL;
  
  	mutex_lock(&sdev->inquiry_mutex);
 -	rcu_swap_protected(sdev->vpd_pg0, vpd_pg0,
 -			   lockdep_is_held(&sdev->inquiry_mutex));
 -	rcu_swap_protected(sdev->vpd_pg80, vpd_pg80,
 -			   lockdep_is_held(&sdev->inquiry_mutex));
 -	rcu_swap_protected(sdev->vpd_pg83, vpd_pg83,
 -			   lockdep_is_held(&sdev->inquiry_mutex));
 -	rcu_swap_protected(sdev->vpd_pg89, vpd_pg89,
 -			   lockdep_is_held(&sdev->inquiry_mutex));
++	vpd_pg0 = rcu_replace_pointer(sdev->vpd_pg0, vpd_pg0,
++				      lockdep_is_held(&sdev->inquiry_mutex));
 +	vpd_pg80 = rcu_replace_pointer(sdev->vpd_pg80, vpd_pg80,
 +				       lockdep_is_held(&sdev->inquiry_mutex));
 +	vpd_pg83 = rcu_replace_pointer(sdev->vpd_pg83, vpd_pg83,
 +				       lockdep_is_held(&sdev->inquiry_mutex));
++	vpd_pg89 = rcu_replace_pointer(sdev->vpd_pg89, vpd_pg89,
++				       lockdep_is_held(&sdev->inquiry_mutex));
  	mutex_unlock(&sdev->inquiry_mutex);
  
+ 	if (vpd_pg0)
+ 		kfree_rcu(vpd_pg0, rcu);
  	if (vpd_pg83)
  		kfree_rcu(vpd_pg83, rcu);
  	if (vpd_pg80)

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2019-10-29  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-29  4:08 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2019-10-29 10:08 ` linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with the rcu tree Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-30  1:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
     [not found] ` <CAEXS_ixkUAPTz4=ta+=+YLrsnmrAcuG43bLNX11Dzffi4L-Upg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-11-02 13:45   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191029150826.38c26ef8@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryanattard@ryanattard.info \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).