Hi Jason,

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 02:21:13 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> wrote:
>
> The rdma for-next tree is right as is, the xa_erase does not need to
> be the irq varient here.

OK, thanks.  I will fix up my resolution for tomorrow.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell