Hi all, This is now a conflict between the scsi tree and Linus' tree. On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:37:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the y2038 tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/scsi/sg.c > > between commits: > > a16a47416d3f ("scsi: sg: sg_ioctl(): fix copyout handling") > c35a5cfb4150 ("scsi: sg: sg_read(): simplify reading ->pack_id of userland sg_io_hdr_t") > d9fc5617bcb6 ("scsi: sg: sg_new_write(): don't bother with access_ok") > > from the scsi tree and commits: > > 98aaaec4a150 ("compat_ioctl: reimplement SG_IO handling") > fd6c3d5accea ("compat_ioctl: move SG_GET_REQUEST_TABLE handling") > > from the y2038 tree. > > I fixed it up (I used one side for some conflicts and the other for > others - see the final file attached) and can carry the fix as > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any > particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell