Hi,

On Fri 10 Jan 20, 15:51, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   9d022be3c192 ("dt-bindings: Document yna vendor-prefix.")
> 
> from the mips tree and commit:
> 
>   885503fbea21 ("dt-bindings: Add Xylon vendor prefix")
> 
> from the gpio tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks for the fix. We might want to keep the list ordered though, with
"xylon" listed after "xunlong" and before "yna".

> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> index b44257d0e16e,9cb3bc683db7..000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> @@@ -1082,8 -1060,8 +1082,10 @@@ patternProperties
>       description: Xilinx
>     "^xunlong,.*":
>       description: Shenzhen Xunlong Software CO.,Limited
>  +  "^yna,.*":
>  +    description: YSH & ATIL
> +   "^xylon,.*":
> +     description: Xylon

So reversing the two blocks above.

What do you think?

Cheers,

Paul

>     "^yones-toptech,.*":
>       description: Yones Toptech Co., Ltd.
>     "^ysoft,.*":



-- 
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com