Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the keys tree got a conflict in: fs/pipe.c between commit: 0ddad21d3e99 ("pipe: use exclusive waits when reading or writing") from Linus' tree and commits: 57421d0685a3 ("pipe: Add general notification queue support") 95e0a8b2f657 ("pipe: Add notification lossage handling") from the keys tree. I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell diff --cc fs/pipe.c index 5a34d6c22d4c,423aafca4338..000000000000 --- a/fs/pipe.c +++ b/fs/pipe.c @@@ -347,10 -375,14 +378,14 @@@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct io if (!buf->len) { pipe_buf_release(pipe, buf); - spin_lock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock); + spin_lock_irq(&pipe->rd_wait.lock); + #ifdef CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE + if (buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LOSS) + pipe->note_loss = true; + #endif tail++; pipe->tail = tail; - spin_unlock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&pipe->rd_wait.lock); } total_len -= chars; if (!total_len) @@@ -1268,11 -1290,62 +1310,63 @@@ int pipe_resize_ring(struct pipe_inode_ kfree(pipe->bufs); pipe->bufs = bufs; pipe->ring_size = nr_slots; - pipe->max_usage = nr_slots; + if (pipe->max_usage > nr_slots) + pipe->max_usage = nr_slots; pipe->tail = tail; pipe->head = head; - wake_up_interruptible_all(&pipe->wait); + wake_up_interruptible_all(&pipe->rd_wait); + wake_up_interruptible_all(&pipe->wr_wait); + return 0; + } + + /* + * Allocate a new array of pipe buffers and copy the info over. Returns the + * pipe size if successful, or return -ERROR on error. + */ + static long pipe_set_size(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned long arg) + { + unsigned long user_bufs; + unsigned int nr_slots, size; + long ret = 0; + + #ifdef CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE + if (pipe->watch_queue) + return -EBUSY; + #endif + + size = round_pipe_size(arg); + nr_slots = size >> PAGE_SHIFT; + + if (!nr_slots) + return -EINVAL; + + /* + * If trying to increase the pipe capacity, check that an + * unprivileged user is not trying to exceed various limits + * (soft limit check here, hard limit check just below). + * Decreasing the pipe capacity is always permitted, even + * if the user is currently over a limit. + */ + if (nr_slots > pipe->max_usage && + size > pipe_max_size && !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) + return -EPERM; + + user_bufs = account_pipe_buffers(pipe->user, pipe->nr_accounted, nr_slots); + + if (nr_slots > pipe->max_usage && + (too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(user_bufs) || + too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(user_bufs)) && + pipe_is_unprivileged_user()) { + ret = -EPERM; + goto out_revert_acct; + } + + ret = pipe_resize_ring(pipe, nr_slots); + if (ret < 0) + goto out_revert_acct; + + pipe->max_usage = nr_slots; + pipe->nr_accounted = nr_slots; return pipe->max_usage * PAGE_SIZE; out_revert_acct: